Table des matières
Les lames de plancher d’ingénierie sont devenues de plus en plus populaires depuis leur apparition dans les années 70. En 1999, les deux tiers des recouvrements de plancher en bois installés en Europe étaient des planchers d’ingénierie. Durant la même année, le tiers des lames de plancher installées aux États-Unis étaient des lames de plancher d’ingénierie. Malgré cette importante percée sur ces marchés, la connaissance sur le comportement du produit est limitée. Les variations des conditions hygrométriques suivant les saisons en Amérique du Nord peuvent induire des déformations hygromécaniques indésirables. L’objectif de ce travail était de comparer cinq constructions de lames de plancher d’ingénierie fabriquées de composants nord-américains. Une méthodologie pour évaluer la performance fut déterminée. Dans les limites de ce travail, la meilleure construction fut la construction faite de 4 mm d’érable à sucre en couche de surface, 8 mm de bouleau blanc comme substrat et un placage de 2 mm comme couche de contrebalancement. La déformation de tirant à cœur fut plus importante dans les constructions avec un substrat en épinette noire de même que dans les constructions sans couche de contrebalancement. L’application d’un vernis a réduit les déformations d’environ 50 %.
Engineered wood flooring is gaining in popularity since it appeared in Europe in the 70’s. In 1999, two thirds of the wood flooring installed in Europe was engineered wood flooring. The same year, one-third of the wood flooring installed in the USA was engineered wood flooring. Although engineered wood flooring captured this important market share, knowledge of its behavior is still very limited. The variations of hygrometric conditions, occurring during the transition from summer to winter in North America can induce undesirable hygromechanical deformation. The objective of this study was to compare five engineered wood flooring constructions made with North American wood components. The methodology was developed to determine the performance of engineered wood flooring. In accordance with the design parameters selected in this study, the best construction was a 4 mm-thick sugar maple surface layer, an 8 mm-thick white birch core layer and a 2 mm-thick yellow birch veneer as backing layer. The cupping distortion in black spruce core construction without backing was 20 percent higher than the white birch construction. Constructions made with white birch core showed a 10 to 40 percent lower cupping distortion than those made with black spruce core. The varnish layer plays an important role in the performance of engineered wood flooring by reducing the cupping distortion by 50 percent since it limits moisture adsorption through the surface layer. There was no significant difference in the distortion measured for two subsequent conditioning cycles indicating that the phenomenon occurs in the elastic domain.
Dimensional stability is of upmost importance in the use of wood composites in general and in layered wood composites in particular. This is especially true for appearance products such as flooring, parquet, cabinet and furniture components. Residual stresses due to the manufacturing process or the non-homogeneous adsorption and desorption of water vapor by the composite in-service may induce distortion, and consequently decrease product value. In this context, the nature of the components in a composite wood product such as engineered wood flooring determines its behavior and value.
Engineered wood flooring products are widely available in Europe and the USA. Engineered wood flooring is common in Europe where 63.8 percent of the hardwood flooring sales are for engineered wood flooring (Anonymous 1998). The market share of engineered wood flooring in the USA increased by 10 percent to reach 30 percent of the hardwood flooring market between 1988 and 1995 (Anonymous 1998, Lamy 1997). In 1999, engineered wood flooring represented 39 percent of the USA market and it is one of the fastest growing segments among floor covering materials (Anonymous 2000). Canada, is a significant hardwood strip flooring manufacturer, but it only has two engineered wood flooring manufacturers. In the USA there are approximately 35 engineered hardwood flooring plants (Anonymous 2001). Significant volumes of hardwood lumber from the USA and Canada are sold to European countries for the manufacture of these products, many of which are sold back to North America. This and the fact that engineered wood flooring uses four times less clear hardwood than traditional strip flooring, thus releasing some of the pressure on the hardwood resource, leads us to conclude that there is an opportunity to build more North American capacity to produce engineered wood flooring. This situation motivates local industries to design engineered wood flooring products better suited for the North American market and resources, thus creating a sustainable competitive advantage.
The technical literature on engineered wood flooring is limited mainly because all the research and development on those products was done on a proprietary basis. Kubler and Lempelius (1972) introduced the European technology used by this industry 30 years ago. No other work was found in the literature on this topic except for description of the manufacture of 3-ply bamboo parquet (Che and Leslie 1999, Lu et al. 1999). European and American standards were developed for those products. The French standard, NF B54-011 (AFNOR 1980) defines performance criteria such as flexural strength, bond line strength and flatness. The standard also suggests a methodology to test flooring in-service for both single-board and in service flatness. A sealed box containing air at a given temperature and relative humidity (RH) is placed over a 120 cm x 120 cm assembled flooring strips to obtain a water vapor movement only through the top surface. Two conditions are tested, 20ºC and 20 percent relative humidity (RH) and 20ºC and 85 percent RH. Flatness is determined by measuring the strip’s distortion using a 120 cm steel flat bar as reference. Distortion over the whole span of this bar must be lower than 0.4 mm to be in accordance with NF B54-011. The ANSI/HPVA LF (1996) standard does not go as far as the French standard on performance assessment of engineered wood flooring, but it defines machining requirements and tolerances for laminated wood flooring which are of 0.3 mm between the strips.
According to wood mechanics (Bodig and Jayne 1993), distortion is related to the mechanical properties of the material used in the layers of the composite and to non-homogenous moisture content. The following hypothesis was made: stresses are developed at the surface layer following the transient moisture transfer occurring when relative humidity changes between winter and summer conditions. Moisture movement occurs primarily in the surface layer of the composite. The moisture content distribution across thickness is subsequently controlled by the permeability of the other layers including the adhesive layers.
To improve its position in wood parquetry and flooring, the North American industry must develop new designs of engineered wood flooring. The objective of this paper is to present the evaluation of various core components used in engineered wood flooring constructions and to build a knowledge data base for future design development taking advantage of low-cost, locally available materials.
Five types of engineered wood flooring constructions were made following the pattern shown in Figure 2.1. The components used came from Canadian industries and are listed in Table 2.1. The core was made of low cost material such as 3B Common (NHLA) (pallet-grade) hardwood heartwood, economy grade softwood, and high density fiberboard (HDF). A 4 mm-thick sugar maple surface layer was chosen for all constructions. Following the French standard NF B 63-204-1 (AFNOR 1997) and Demange (1998), a 4 mm-thick surface layer was used, which is appropriate for high traffic intensity and offers a possibility of sanding comparable to the traditional North American hardwood flooring. Therefore, since all engineered wood floorings were made with the same surface layer, the
Figure 2.1 Engineered wood flooring construction used in this study.
stress induced in the composite by moisture content changes at the surface was nearly the same for all combinations. A 2 mm-thick yellow birch veneer was used as backing layer. It was applied to white birch, black spruce and HDF core (constructions C1, C2 and C3, Table 2.1). For the first two core materials, the composites were made with and without a backing layer (constructions C1, C2 and C4, C5, Table 2.1) to assess its influence on flooring behavior. Hygrothermal conditions typical of winter and summer conditions were reproduced in the laboratory to evaluate the cupping distortion with constructions made with different core and backing layers but with a constant surface layer. All flooring constructions were bonded by hot pressing with a urea-formaldehyde (UF) resin provided by Borden Chemicals widely used in the engineered wood flooring industry. Table 2.2 shows the resin and pressing specifications.
The constructions were evaluated following two methodologies. First, an in-service test was performed on a 61 cm by 122 cm floor made with a 19 mm-thick plywood sub-floor supported by 38 mm by 100 mm (2x4) joists (Figure 2.2) on which an engineered wood flooring was installed, alternating a 61 cm long strip and two 30.5 cm long strips bonded to the floor with a urethane adhesive as used in the industry. Second, a single sample test was performed on 3 freestanding strips sealed with silicone sealant and aluminum foil on the back face and edges to simulate the behavior in-service. On all strip samples, distortion was measured at five locations. The same measurements were made on 3 varnished freestanding strips. These strips were also moisture sealed on all faces except on top. Derived from the NF B 54-011 (AFNOR 1980) standard and simulating North American summer and winter relative humidity conditions, the samples were exposed to dry conditions (winter) established at 20±1°C and 20±5 % RH and humid conditions (summer) established as 20°C and 80 % RH. All the material was conditioned at 20°C and 50 % RH before and after manufacturing. All constructions were subjected to three cycles: humid, dry, humid, for 60, 50 and 50 days of conditioning respectively. The length of the first cycle was increased due to variation of the conditions in the conditioning room.
Table 2.2 Urea formaldehyde resin and pressing specifications used to assemble the flooring constructions.
|
Figure 2.2 In-service evaluation sample with location of measurement.
The distortions were measured with a dial gauge over the width of the strip (Figure 2.3). On the large-scale floor, measurements were done along a line located at one-third of the floor edge length. Measurements were done with a gage moving along a reference line. Precision of the measurement was assured by meticulous installation of the gauge and the high number of replications on each floor (17 replications). Precision and repeatability in this measure were within the hundredth of mm. Measurements included possible distortion due to the strip end-joint (Figure 2.2).
To assess the effect of the varnish layer on the mechanical properties of maple, 10 sugar maple planks, 4 mm in thickness (radial direction), 65 mm in width and 60 cm in length were cut into four 15 cm-long pieces. Two pieces were coated on the top surface with a commercial polyurethane varnish and the two others were left uncoated. Static bending tests were performed on those samples. This test involved a center point loading with roller bearing support and a cross-head speed of 5.328 mm per minute. Span used was 96 mm (24 times the sample thickness). For the varnished samples, one test was done with the varnish layer in compression (varnish layer top surface) and the other in tension (varnish layer bottom surface).
Figure 2.3 Distortion measurement method used in this study.
A numerical criterion was used to define acceptability of cupping distortion. This was determined to be 0.25 mm for both positive and negative distortions (Figure 2.3) of a single strip. This value was obtained through a product development project with the flooring industry and it is based on qualitative and perception experiments in which twelve people were asked to walk on floor with various levels of distortion (Lefebvre and Beauregard 1999). It has already gained market acceptance with the customers of the industry partners that participated in its development. This criterion is different from overall flatness such as specified in NF B 54-011 (AFNOR 1980). It is also different from the machining tongue and groove tolerance in the ANSI/HPVA LF standard (1996).
An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed on the variables studied. The models used for the ANOVA are presented in Tables 2.3, 2.5 and 2.7. Figure 2.4 shows a typical curve of the distortion as a function of time and the variables studied in this project: amplitude of the distortion and slope between 13 and 28 days in a conditioning cycle. The amplitude was measured over time for each conditioning cycle. The slope was the rate of distortion in the linear segment, between day 13 and day 28 in each conditioning cycle. The maximum absolute distortion was the distortion as measured directly on the flooring strips with the dial gauge.
All the engineered wood flooring constructions were exposed to 3 conditioning cycles, which were respectively summer, winter and summer conditions (Figure 2.4).
Figure 2.4 Typical distortion as a function of time and the conditioning cycle.
Figure 2.5 presents distortion curves as a function of time. It should be noted that there was an 8 hour increase in the temperature at day 28 of the first cycle. This perturbation of the temperature resulted in a dip in the curve of Figures 2.5 and 2.6, but it did not result in a rejection of the cycle data since this zone was not considered in the analysis. Distortion was observed on engineered wood flooring installed on a floor (Figure 2.5). In this Figure (2.5), the construction made with HDF (C3) showed the highest cupping distortion under winter condition followed by black spruce without backing (C5), and then by black spruce with backing (C2) which was similar to white birch without backing (C4). The construction made of white birch with a backing layer (C1) was the best construction to limit cupping distortion. For winter conditions, none of the constructions met the performance criterion of 0.25 mm. For summer conditions, all constructions showed lower maximum absolute distortion than the performance criterion.
An ANOVA was performed on the amplitude of the distortion between two different cycles, i.e., the difference between the maximum distortion in summer conditions and the minimum distortion in winter conditions. For in-service engineered wood flooring, the amplitude between the first summer cycle and the winter cycle was not statistically different (Table 2.3) from the amplitude between the winter cycle and the second summer cycle. This suggests that these distortions occurred in the elastic domain because of the repeatability of the deformation following two cycles.
Table 2.3 ANOVA of amplitude and slope for all evaluation methods; in-service unvarnished, freestanding unvarnished and freestanding varnished.
|
Table 2.3 shows a statistical difference (α=0.01) in the amplitude of distortion between black spruce and white birch constructions (contrast 2). The black spruce construction without backing (C4) had 20 percent higher distortion than the white birch construction (C5) (Table 2.4). When relative humidity dramatically changes, the core layer material appears to work against the stress induced by the shrinkage/swelling of the surface layer. White birch has a higher MOE than black spruce: 12.9 GPa against 10.5 GPa (Jessome 2000). This can explain the lower cupping distortion obtained with a white birch core as shown in Figure 2.5.
Table 2.3 also shows that the construction using HDF as core material (C3) resulted in a significantly higher distortion amplitude (α=0.01) as shown in Figure 2.5. From our results, it is clear that the nature of the core layer material has an important effect on the performance of the engineered wood flooring. HDF was the material with the lowest mechanical properties, an MOE of only 3.45 GPa is required by ANSI A208.2 (1994), and its performance in this study was poorer than that of white birch and black spruce constructions. White birch is stiffer than black spruce and the latter is also more rigid than HDF. This ranking shows in the constructions’ performance as illustrated in Figure 2.5.
The ANOVA also shows a statistical difference (α=0.01) between the constructions made with (C1, C2) and without backing (C4, C5). Even if the backing layer is oriented in the same direction as the surface layer, it appears to increase the stiffness of the composite. Therefore a lower distortion results from the stress developed at the surface following its shrinkage or swelling (Tables 2.3 and 2.4).
Table 2.4 Amplitude of distortion between the conditioning cycles and slope of the rate of distortion between 13 and 28 days of conditioning in each cycle (Legend refers to Table 1).
|
The second part of Figure 2.5 (i.e. 73 to 100 days in the winter cycle), where the slope is less steep in a cycle was also analyzed. The slope was assessed for the rate of cupping distortion between 13 and 28 days of conditioning for each cycle (Figure 2.4). Although all the curves have the same shape, a statistical difference (α=0.01) was observed between the slopes for composites with different constructions (Table 2.3). The slope appears to be a function of the transient moisture content distribution and physical and mechanical properties in each layer of the composite where shrinkage is a result of the moisture gradient.
Figure 2.5 Cupping distortion of the flooring constructions on floor following time and conditioning cycles (legend refers to Table 2.1).
Figure 2.6 presents the evolution of the cupping distortion of unvarnished freestanding flooring strips as a function of time. Under summer conditions, only the unvarnished constructions made from an HDF core did not meet the performance criterion (0.250 mm). Under winter conditions, all the unvarnished constructions failed to meet the criterion (Figure 2.6).
Figure 2.6 Cupping distortion of unvarnished freestanding flooring constructions following time and conditioning cycles (legend refers to Table 2.1).
An ANOVA was performed on the data (Table 2.3). No significant difference (α=0.05) was observed between the amplitudes of distortion for two different cycles. Again, this suggests that the distortion occurred in the elastic domain. Differences in distortion of composites with different core materials were significant (α=0.01). Constructions made with white birch (C1, C4) showed 10 to 40 percent better performance, respectively, than those made with black spruce (C2, C5) (Table 2.4). All of the constructions showed a better performance than the ones made with a HDF (C3) core, which showed a distortion at least 25 percent higher than all other constructions (Table 2.4). In the case of unvarnished freestanding strips, the backing layer did not have a significant effect on the performance of the engineered wood flooring (Figure 2.6 and Table 2.3), however it improves the appearance of the product.
The less steep part of each cycle of Figure 2.6 was also analyzed. Even if all the curves showed a similar shape, a significant difference (α=0.01) was observed between the slopes (Table 2.3), i.e. the rate of cupping distortion between 13 and 28 days of conditioning for each cycle different (Figure 2.4). This confirms previous observations made for in-service flooring strips.
The effect of varnish on distortion was investigated. Curves of distortion versus time following exposure to variable hygrometric conditions were obtained for varnished freestanding strips (Figure 2.7). All varnished constructions met the 0.25 mm criterion of maximum deformation for both winter and summer conditions. This suggests that the varnish layer has a significant effect and that it must be taken into account in the design.
Figure 2.7 Cupping distortion of the varnished freestanding flooring strip constructions following time and conditioning (legend refers to Table 1).
It is interesting to notice how the varnish slows down moisture transfer across the strip surface probably resulting in lower moisture content gradients in the surface layer and therefore less shrinkage/swelling distortion in the surface layer. Statistical analysis showed no difference between the amplitude for any of the two conditioning cycles (Table 2.3 and Figure 2.7). Again, this suggests that the distortion occurred in the elastic domain. For example, the maximum amplitude for the unvarnished constructions made of HDF was 0.594 mm with 0.274 mm obtained after 2 days of relative humidity change. For varnished HDF construction, the amplitude was 0.234 mm with only 0.042 mm after 2 days of conditioning. This illustrates that almost 50 percent of the distortion happened at the moment that hygrometric conditions changed for unvarnished strips, which was not the case for varnished strips. In this case, following the change in conditions distortion was practically zero. The use of an appropriate varnish increases the performance of a construction as was the case for the construction made with a HDF core. For HDF based construction the performance became as good as the others when varnished. In fact, all of the significant differences expected by the nature of the material and the backing layer in both on floor and freestanding strips became non-significant when a varnish layer was applied (Table 2.3).
No significant difference was observed in the ANOVA presented in Table 3 for the slope of the curve between 13 and 28 days of conditioning in a cycle and construction type. This suggests that the rate of moisture transfer in this part of the curve is limited by the same moisture barrier, the varnish for all constructions. In Table 2.5, the ANOVA shows a significant difference (α=0.01) for the slopes between 13 and 28 days of conditioning in a cycle for vanished and unvarnished strips, but even for this it is interesting to note that the general shape of the curve is similar.
It is significant that the varnish does not directly increase the modulus of elasticity of the strips. Bending tests performed on the sugar maple surface planks, varnished and unvarnished showed no significant difference as presented in Table 2.6. It appears that the varnish creates a low diffusion coefficient layer on the wood surface and has no direct impact on its mechanical properties, but indirectly, it seems that varnish could affect in-service MOE by keeping the moisture content low and by reducing the moisture content cycling.
Most of the differences observed on the in-service unvarnished-engineered wood flooring were also observed for unvarnished freestanding strips. In both cases, the amplitude of the distortion appeared to be the criterion of choice to establish differences in performance of various engineered flooring constructions performances. Significant difference was found between the amplitude of in-service distortion of unvarnished strip and freestanding unvarnished strip (Table 2.7).
The objective of this study was to evaluate a set of North American components for engineered wood flooring manufacturing and to increase knowledge of engineered wood flooring behavior. The distortion in engineered wood flooring is the result of a transient phenomenon, where a high moisture content gradient in the surface layer is responsible for the cupping distortion due to shrinkage of the surface layer when the underlying layer does not shrink. Observations made on different constructions after three conditioning cycles indicated that the deformation occurs in the elastic domain. This important observation suggests that Hooke’s law of elasticity can describe the mechanical behavior of this composite within the limits of the experiment.
The results of this study show that the mechanical properties of the core layer have an important effect on the performance of engineered wood flooring. For unvarnished strips in-service and freestanding strips, the flooring constructions tested were ranked according to the MOE of the core layer material. In the case of unvarnished constructions in-service strips, it appears that the type of backing layer also influenced performance. The cupping distortion in black spruce core construction without backing was 20 percent higher than the white birch construction. Constructions made with white birch core layer showed 10 to 40 percent lower cupping distortion than those made with black spruce.
Finally, an overlaying varnish layer has a major influence on the behavior of engineered wood flooring. The cupping distortion was reduced by at least 50 percent through the use of a varnish. All varnished freestanding strips met the cupping distortion performance criterion. All significant differences between unvarnished constructions became non-significant when varnish was applied. It can be concluded that it is important to take into account the finishing system in the design of engineered wood flooring.